Online access to case information for payments in pick juvenile and domestic relations district courts. Cases could possibly be searched using name, case number, or hearing date.
In accordance with the EPA payment schedule, the request should be limited in scope, instead of be meant for redistribution to the internet or for commercial purposes.
four. It has been noticed by this Court that there is often a delay of at some point during the registration of FIR which has not been explained with the complainant. Moreover, there is no eye-witness on the alleged event and the prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession of the petitioners is tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram occurred being the real brothers of the deceased but they did not react in the slightest degree towards the confessional statements on the petitioners and calmly noticed them leaving, just one after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not appear much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is no explanation as to why her arrest was not effected after making of your alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on a great number of instances that extra judicial confession of the accused is really a weak kind of evidence which could be manoeuvred by the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not appear their way. The prosecution is likewise relying on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal didn't say a word as to presence of some light in the place, where they allegedly noticed the petitioners together on the motorcycle at 4.
Deterrence: The fear of severe penalties, together with capital punishment, is meant to discourage prospective criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is essential in reducing the prevalence of intentional killings.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
It allows individuals to research legal issues, understand their rights, and prepare for legal proceedings. This access is particularly important in Pakistan, where legal aid is usually costly and tricky to obtain.
whether whilst granting promotion senior employees were regarded as for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)
This system, to be used by members of the get more info Virginia State Bar and their designated staff, allows electronic filing of most civil cases in circuit court.
I) The above referred case FIR, to the murder of deceased namely Muhammad Sajjad, was registered on the complaint of Muhammad Sharif son of Ghulam Farid that is father of your petitioner and as per Tale of FIR, the petitioner can be an eyewkness in the prevalence.
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the weight specified to any reported judgment may rely on the reputation of both the reporter along with the judges.[7]
She did note that the boy still needed intensive therapy in order to manage with his abusive past, and “to reach the point of being Harmless with other children.” The boy was getting counseling with a DCFS therapist. Again, the court approved from the actions.
90 . Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Jehangir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is also important to note that neither seniority nor promotion will be the vested right of a civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion could possibly be claimed or granted without the actual size of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular size of service for turning out to be entitled to get regarded as for promotion to some higher grade, of course, is not without logic as the officer who is initially inducted to the particular post needs to provide over the reported post to gain experience to hold the next higher post and to provide the public in a befitting fashion.
The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary into the determination in the current case are called obiter dicta, which represent persuasive authority but are certainly not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil law jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[four]